1851
“Twenty students begin at the University of Minnesota. Beginning in a small building with only one teacher, the university won’t offer college-level instruction until 1869.” *
Great Teacher, thanks for the blessings we have today because of these small beginnings! What good things grow from small seeds? Will You lead my thoughts and prayer for the “U” today?
Here’s a basic summary of the founding of the school as given on it’s website:
“The University of Minnesota was founded as a preparatory school in 1851 seven years before the territory of Minnesota became a state. Financial problems forced the school to close during the Civil War, but with the help of Minneapolis entrepreneur John Sargent Pillsbury, it reopened in1867. Known as the father of the University, Pillsbury, who was a University regent, state senator, and governor, used his influence to establish the school as the official recipient of public support from the Morrill Land-Grant Act, designating it as Minnesota’s land-grant university.” **
Thank You for the opportunities this university created for students in its’ first decade! Thank You for the synergy of it’s re-opening: one part government, one part business, one part Pillsbury influence. How many students had a chance to learn because of the determination and will of J.S. Pillsbury? Today we thank You for these individuals, and the impact of the this school on their lives!
Truly, it would be difficult to summarize the impact of our University on our state, nation, and world over these past 150 years. Every discipline seems to exert a significant force and merit recognition in our nation. Students from the entire continent of North America gather here to learn. Our Mid-Western culture values and expects that most Minnesotans want a college degree.
Perhaps a limitation of education is that knowledge is not necessarily relational?
Counselor, will You have mercy on the roots of the false pride of knowledge that grew from this founding seed, both in teacher and pupil? Will You forgive us our judgments’ of our neighbor’s ignorance or our prejudices against formal education within the culture of Minnesota from this era forward? “…We know that we all possess knowledge. Knowledge puffs up, but love builds up. The man who thinks he knows something does not yet know as he ought to know. but the man who loves G-d is known by G-d.” 1Corinthians 8:1-3
*http://www.mnhs.org/about/dipity_timeline.htm
praythroughhistory 
Thank you for looking into Agnellusmirror and liking what you saw there … regarding this article of yours – knowledge relational to what or whom? A self-styled atheist may challenge others to think more deeply, to ‘ponder’ in Luke’s words; praying without knowing it. And all who love the truth love The Truth in so far as they perceive Him. No? Hope Itself persists for other people, even when we give up on .them.
Imo, knowledge must exist in a framework that makes it relevant. This is both statement and acknowledgement to G-d that we want knowledge apart from knowing Him. This is a human problem that I too am participant. Thanks!
By ‘relational knowledge’ I’m referring to the difference between knowledge of the head, and ‘knowing’ through time spent in relationship. I find it sad that the most technologically advanced societies have often used their advancements in war rather than improving relational knowledge. The best and brightest can still be cavemen at heart if they haven’t spent time learning about love and forgiveness. I respond to an example of a G-d who washes the feet of the poor.
I like your historical blogs…
They are borrowed. Some are amplified by me. My point is the interaction with history and diminishing cultural transference and our heaping offenses to G-d by offending our fellow human. Thanks!